UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the Fiscal Year Ended
or
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the transition period from _____ to _____
Commission File No.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
|
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐ |
|
|
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2021, based on the closing price on that date of $16.99 per share, was approximately $
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Audit Firm Id:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item |
|
Description |
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. |
|
|
5 |
||
ITEM 1A. |
|
|
32 |
||
ITEM 1B. |
|
|
50 |
||
ITEM 2. |
|
|
50 |
||
ITEM 3. |
|
|
50 |
||
ITEM 4. |
|
|
51 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
|
52 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
|
52 |
||
ITEM 7. |
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
53 |
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
|
66 |
||
ITEM 8. |
|
|
66 |
||
ITEM 9. |
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
|
66 |
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
|
66 |
||
ITEM 9B. |
|
|
67 |
||
ITEM 9C. |
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS |
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
|
68 |
||
ITEM 11. |
|
|
68 |
||
ITEM 12. |
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
|
68 |
|
ITEM 13. |
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
|
68 |
|
ITEM 14. |
|
|
68 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
|
69 |
||
ITEM 16. |
|
|
71 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise specified, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Helius” or “the Company” mean Helius Medical Technologies, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Helius Medical, Inc, or HMI, Helius NeuroRehab, Inc., or HNR, Helius Medical Technologies (Canada), Inc., or HMC, and Helius Canada Acquisition Ltd., or HCA, unless the context otherwise requires. All financial information is stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise specified. Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K, or the Annual Report, includes certain statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements.” All statements contained in this Annual Report, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that the Company expects to occur, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s expectations at the time the statements are made and are subject to risks, uncertainty, and changes in circumstances, which may cause actual results, performance, financial condition or achievements to differ materially from anticipated results, performance, financial condition or achievements. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking and the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “calls for,” “could” “depends,” “estimate,” “expect,” “extrapolate,” “foresee,” “goal,” “intend,” “likely,” “might,” “plan,” “project,” “propose,” “potential,” “target,” “think,” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “may,” “should occur” “will,” “would,” or any similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include but are not limited to statements relating to: the Company’s future growth and operational progress, including manufacturing activities for the PoNS device, receipt of prescriptions and progress of commercialization of the PoNS device in the U.S., the COVID-19 pandemic including its impact on the Company, clinical development plans, product development activities, plans for U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, filings and their subsequent approvals, other foreign or domestic regulatory filings, the safety and effectiveness of our product, our market awareness, our ability to compete effectively, the ability and limitation of our manufacturing source(s), our distribution network, the adequacy of our intellectual property protection, our future patent approvals, our future expenses and cash flow, our ability to become profitable, our future financing arrangements, our accountants’ future perspective including any going concerns, any future stock price, our ability to build commercial infrastructure, and our ability to receive reimbursement coverage under Medicare, Medicaid or under other insurance plans.
Such forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by Helius, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive political and social uncertainties and contingencies. The factors and assumptions used by management of the Company to develop such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, uncertainties associated with the Company’s capital requirements to achieve its business objectives, availability of funds, including that funding from our purchase agreement with Lincoln Park Capital Fund, LLC may be limited or be insufficient to fund our operations, the ability to find additional sources of funding, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, manufacturing, labor shortage and supply chain risks, including risks related to manufacturing delays, build a commercial team and build relationships with Key Opinion Leaders, neurology experts and neurorehabilitation centers the Company’s ability to train physical therapists in the supervision of the use of the PoNS treatment, the Company’s ability to secure contracts with rehabilitation clinics, the Company’s ability to obtain national Medicare coverage and to obtain a reimbursement code so that the PoNS device is covered by Medicare and Medicaid, the Company’s ability to build internal commercial infrastructure, secure state distribution licenses, market awareness of the PoNS device, future clinical trials and the clinical development process, the product development process and FDA regulatory submission review and approval process, other development activities, ongoing government regulation and other factors included in the section entitled “Risk Factors.”
Although we believe the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions at the time they were made, they are subject to risks and uncertainties, known and unknown, which could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results may differ significantly from such forward-looking statements.
You should refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame, or at all.
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future. You should, however, review the factors and risks and other information we describe in the reports we will file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) after the date of this Annual Report.
2
SUMMARY RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to a number of risks, as fully described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Annual Report. The principal factors and uncertainties include, among others:
|
• |
We have a history of losses and may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future; |
|
• |
We will require additional financing to carry out our plan of operations, and failure to obtain such financing may cause our business to fail; |
|
• |
We currently only have one product, the PoNS device, which is authorized for commercial distribution in Canada, Australia, and in the U.S. for treatment of MS, and we have not obtained authorization to distribute the PoNS device commercially in Europe or in the U.S. for other indications and may never obtain such authorizations; |
|
• |
We may encounter substantial delays in planned clinical trials, and planned clinical trials may fail to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the PoNS device to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities; |
|
• |
Generation of revenue related to the PoNS technology is dependent on the PoNS Therapy being prescribed by physicians in the U.S. and our ability to train physical therapists in the supervision of the use of the PoNS Therapy; |
|
• |
Market awareness of the PoNS device is limited, and the neuromodulation market is new and uncertain; |
|
• |
We are dependent on third-party scientists and research institutions, in part, for research and development and on third parties for the manufacture and distribution of our product; |
|
• |
The COVID-19 pandemic and outbreaks of communicable diseases may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations; |
|
• |
Third parties may gain access to our technology if our intellectual property protection is insufficient; |
|
• |
We may be subject to various litigation claims and legal proceedings, including intellectual property litigation, which may adversely affect our business; |
|
• |
Commercialization of our product outside of Canada, Australia, and the U.S. for indications other than MS is dependent on obtaining market authorization from the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities, which will require significant time, research, development, and clinical study expenditures and ultimately may not be successful; |
|
• |
Failure to secure contracts with workers’ compensation and third-party administrators or rehabilitation clinics could have a negative impact on our sales and would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results; |
|
• |
Failure to obtain a reimbursement code from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services so that the PoNS device is covered by Medicare and Medicaid could have a negative impact on our intended sales and would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results; |
|
• |
If we fail to comply with healthcare laws, we could face substantial penalties and financial exposure; |
|
• |
We face ongoing government scrutiny and regulation in connection with the development of product candidates and following marketing authorization; |
|
• |
After commercialization, a product recall or the discovery of serious safety issues with our products could have a significant adverse impact on us; and |
|
• |
We have been the victim of a cyber-related crime, and our controls may not be successful in avoiding future cyber-related crimes. |
|
• |
We are reliant on third-party, single-sourced contract manufacturing, exposing us to risks that could delay our sales or result in higher costs or lost product revenues. |
3
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
In this Annual Report, we reference information, statistics and estimates regarding the medical devices and healthcare industries. We have obtained this information from various third-party sources, including industry and general publications, reports by market research firms and other sources. This information involves a number of assumptions and limitations, and we have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of this information. Some data and other information are also based on the good faith estimates of management, which are derived from our research, review of internal surveys, general information discussed in the industry, and third-party sources. We believe that these external sources and estimates are reliable but have not independently verified them. The industries in which we operate are subject to a high degree of uncertainty, change, and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in this Annual Report and other publications.
4
PART I
ITEM 1. |
BUSINESS |
Overview
We are a neurotechnology company focused on neurological wellness. Our purpose is to develop, license or acquire non-implanted technologies targeted at reducing symptoms of neurological disease or trauma.
Our product, known as the Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator, or PoNS®, is an innovative non-implanted medical device, inclusive of a controller and mouthpiece, which delivers mild electrical stimulation to the surface of the tongue to provide treatment of gait deficit and chronic balance deficit. PoNS has marketing clearance in the U.S. for use in the U.S. as a short term treatment of gait deficit due to mild-to-moderate symptoms for multiple sclerosis, or MS, and is to be used as an adjunct to a supervised therapeutic exercise program in patients 22 years of age and over by prescription only. We are currently accepting prescriptions for PoNS in the U.S., and we expect the first commercial sales to occur in the near term. PoNS is authorized for sale in Canada for two indications: (i) for use as a short term treatment (14 weeks) of chronic balance deficit due to mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury, or mmTBI, and is to be used in conjunction with physical therapy, or PoNS TherapyTM; and (ii) for use as a short term treatment (14 weeks) of gait deficit due to mild and moderate symptoms from MS and it is to be used in conjunction with physical therapy. It has been commercially available in Canada since March 2019. PoNS is authorized for sale as a Class IIa medical device in Australia and we are currently seeking a business partner to commercialize and distribute PoNS in Australia.
PoNS Device
The PoNS device is a non-implanted medical device comprised of a controller and a mouthpiece that are connected by a cord. The controller is worn around the neck and the mouthpiece sits on the tongue during treatment. PoNS Therapy, or the “Therapy”, utilizes the PoNS device in conjunction with supervised therapeutic exercise. The Therapy consists of condition specific exercises for movement control, balance and gait training, and breathing and awareness training that are designed to focus on the individual patient’s functional deficits. The Therapy is completed over a period of 14 weeks. The first 2 weeks of the Therapy are administered in a rehabilitation or physical therapy clinic by a PoNS trained therapist. The remaining 12 weeks are completed at home with weekly clinic visits to monitor progress, assess improvements and ensure the therapy level is still appropriate. When the device is on, the 143 gold-plated electrodes on the mouthpiece send mild electrical signals to the tongue. These impulses stimulate sensory nerves in the tongue that have direct pathways to the brain, through the brain stem. The combination of mild stimulation with supervised therapeutic exercise may enhance the neuroplastic effect, potentially resulting in functional improvements in balance and gait. During each clinic visit and at the end of the 14-week Therapy, the clinic downloads the PoNS usage data from the device and reviews it with the patient. This usage data in combination with the detail of the completed treatment assessments gives the clinician and the patient a unique and powerful method to assess treatment progress. The patient initiates their Therapy sessions with the PoNS device under the supervision of the clinicians through regular check ins.
Clinical research has shown that translingual neurostimulation activates two major cranial nerves – the trigeminal nerve, and the facial nerve, which creates a flow of neural impulses that are delivered directly into the brain stem and cerebellum – the main control centers for multiple functions including sensory perception and movement. From the brain stem, these impulses travel throughout the brain and may activate or reactivate neurons and structures involved in human function. Researchers believe that supervised therapeutic exercise with neurostimulation can initiate changes in the brain, supporting the restructuring and reorganization (neuroplasticity) of certain areas of the brain.
5
Design
The PoNS device is ergonomically designed for patient comfort, is relatively light, contains a replaceable hygienic mouthpiece and a rechargeable battery with built-in technology to allow for tracking of the patient’s usage, including time and intensity of treatments. See Figure 1.
Figure 1
The Portable Neuromodulation Stimulator, PoNS device
The mouthpiece of the PoNS device sits on the front third of the tongue and is held in place by the lips and closed mouth. See Figure 2.
Figure 2
A rechargeable lithium polymer battery with built-in charge safety circuitry provides power. While the voltage and pulse timing to each electrode are programmed into the device and cannot be altered, the user can adjust the stimulus intensity, which is achieved by adjusting the electrical pulse width. The sensation produced by the mouthpiece is similar to the feeling of drinking a carbonated beverage. The patented waveform is specifically designed to minimize the potential for tissue irritation.
Overview of Multiple Sclerosis and Current Available Treatments
Multiple Sclerosis, or MS, is currently classified as an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. The disease attacks the myelin, the protective covering of the nerve necessary for the transmission of nerve impulses through nerve fibers, causing inflammation and often damaging the myelin. Damage to the myelin is variable, depending on the course of the disease, which influences the type and severity of symptoms. MS is unpredictable and can cause symptoms such as extreme fatigue, lack of coordination, weakness, tingling, impaired sensation, vision problems, bladder problems, cognitive impairment and mood changes. Its effects can be physical and emotional with a substantial financial burden. Currently there is no cure and patients with MS experience a progressive decline in health over time. There are a variety of treatments available for MS, some of which are experimental, including pharmaceutical, dietary, and surgical, which may or may not be covered by government or private health insurance.
Findings from a National MS Society study estimate that nearly 1 million people in the U.S. are living with MS of which approximately 25-30% are on Medicare and 93,000 people in Canada are living with MS. The National MS Society estimates that 2.3 million people
6
live with MS globally. The U.S. and Canada have the highest rates of MS, with 309 cases per 100,000 in the U.S., and 291 cases per 100,000 in Canada, respectively. Given the nature of this neurodegenerative disease, these individuals and their caretakers are active in exploring treatment options that may resolve or delay the progression of symptoms. There is also a well-established advocacy framework.
Mobility disability and walking impairment are among the most debilitating consequences of MS with approximately 85% of individuals diagnosed with MS reporting gait impairment as a major limitation in their daily lives. Gait is one of the most important bodily functions for MS patients and gait parameters, such as walking speed and stride length, have been shown to be significant predicators of patient independence in daily activities. A survey of 436 patients found that 45% reported a mobility disability in the first month following diagnosis, with upwards of 90% of patients reporting a mobility disability within 10 years of their diagnosis. Additionally, 50-80% of MS patients suffer from balance and gait dysfunction and over 50% fall at least once a year. It has also been reported that unemployment rates in MS patients range from 24-80% with higher rates associated with decreased ambulation and mobility. The Centers for Disease Control, or CDC, reports that individuals with disabilities, like MS, that result in limited mobility are at greater risk for health problems including injury, mental health and depression, overweight and obesity, pain, pressure sores or ulcers and other issues.
A 2016 economic analysis of MS found the total lifetime costs per person with MS to be $4.1 million, with average yearly healthcare costs ranging from $30 thousand to $100 thousand based on the severity of the disease. Since the exact cause of MS is still unknown, there is no known prevention. Although there is no cure for MS yet, treatments can manage symptoms. MS medications are designed to lessen the frequency of relapses and slow the progression of the disease, but none have proven to halt progression of the disease.
While there are several disease-modifying medications approved by the FDA to treat MS, only one drug approved by FDA and Heath Canada, Ampyra® (dalfampridine), is indicated for the improvement of gait speed in patients with MS, which offers the closest comparison to the effects of PoNS Therapy on improvement in gait.
Overview of mmTBI and Current Available Treatments
There are an estimated 14.5 million people globally, with over 1.5 million in the U.S. and 350,000 in Canada, living with balance deficit due to mmTBI. Every year in the U.S. and Canada, there are approximately 420,000 and 20,000 newly diagnosed mmTBIs, respectively, resulting in balance deficit. This condition often has a significant impact on one’s quality of life, negatively affecting independence, employability, productivity, mental health and participation in the community. Rehabilitation is often required following a mmTBI for resulting motor, cognitive and behavioral impairments. The current standard of care to address balance issues following a mmTBI is supervised therapeutic exercise. While supervised therapeutic exercise can help to promote balance recovery, individuals are often unable to return to their full function and are left living with a balance deficit.
Prior to the development of the PoNS device, there were no cleared treatments that were clinically indicated to treat balance deficit. A few studies have suggested that supervised therapeutic exercise aimed at improving balance and gait may be mildly effective for rehabilitation in the mmTBI population. Given the small number of published studies, the small number of patients enrolled in the studies of which we are aware, the varying range of interventional protocols employed in such studies and the lower levels of study design, it is difficult to draw any conclusions regarding the effectiveness and dosing parameters of using supervised therapeutic exercise alone for the treatment of balance deficit following mmTBI. Consequently, we believe that there is a large potential commercial opportunity for the PoNS Therapy in the treatment of balance deficit due to mmTBI. Our goal is to establish the PoNS Therapy as the standard of care for this condition all over the world.
PoNS Clinical Trials and Scientific Support in MS
There are two peer reviewed published clinical trials reporting on the results of clinical trials comparing active PoNS + PT vs Placebo PoNS + PT in subjects with mild and moderate MS: Tyler et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:79 and Leonard et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal Experimental, Translational and Clinical January-March 2017: 19 DOI: 10.1177/ 2055217317690561
Summary results of the Tyler study in 20 patients with mild and moderate MS:
|
• |
In a comparison of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), a measure of the ability to walk, after 14 weeks of treatment of 10 subjects treated with active PoNS + PT Vs 10 subjects treated with placebo PoNS + PT |
|
• |
Results showed a statistically significant change (p<0.005) in favor of the Active PoNS group. |
Summary results from the Leonard study in 14 patients treated with mild and moderate MS:
|
• |
At week 14 there was a statistically significant improvement p=0.001 in the NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test (SOT), a test of subject’s ability to balance, versus baseline for the 7 subjects in the active PoNS treated group and non-significant change in the 7 subjects in placebo PoNS treated group vs baseline. |
7
Summary of Real-World Evidence (RWE) in MS patients treated with PoNS in Canada.
|
• |
Treatment outcomes for patients treated in Canada are captured in the Company-developed validated data capture system. 43 patients with MS were treated with PoNS in Canada between March 2019 and December 2019. |
|
• |
Using all available data from the treated MS patients, the mean improvement from baseline to Week 14 in the FGA (functional gait assessment) was 4.53 (95% CI 3.35 to 5.72). Based on observed data, the median improvement was 5 points. |
|
• |
56.7% had an improvement at Week 14 greater than or equal to 4 points, the minimum detectable change. We believe this finding is particularly notable given that the RWE data set consisted of patients with chronic MS with long durations of disease. |
|
• |
Given the excellent safety profile, these data support a positive benefit risk ratio in the real-world setting. |
PoNS Clinical Trials and Scientific Support in mmTBI
There are two peer reviewed published clinical trials reporting on the results of the PoNS Therapy for persons with mmTBI. The first is from our registrational clinical trial (TBI-001): Ptito A, Papa, L, Gregory, K, Folmer, RL, Walker, WC, Prabhakaran, V, Wardini, R, Skinner, KL, Yochelson, M, (2020). “A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Translingual Neurostimulation Plus Physical Therapy for the Treatment of a Chronic Balance Deficit Due to Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury”. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. The second is from the Long-Term Treatment study in mmTBI Trial: Tyler, ME, Skinner, KL, Prabhakaran, V, Kaczmarek, KA, Danilov, YP (2019). “Translingual neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic symptoms due to mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury.” Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation; 1(304):100026.
PoNS Registrational Clinical Trial in mmTBI
We completed our registrational clinical trial (TBI-001) of the PoNS Therapy for persons with mmTBI in 2017. It was a double-blind randomized, controlled study of the safety and effectiveness of the PoNS Therapy using translingual noninvasive stimulation in participants with balance deficit due to mmTBI.
The trial was launched in 2015 in conjunction with the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, or the USAMRMC, and was conducted at seven sites in the U.S. and Canada. The trial evaluated 122 randomized participants between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Each participant received five weeks of treatment, two weeks in clinic and three weeks at home. The treatment consisted of physical therapy geared toward the functional capability of each individual participant. Enrolled participants worked with a certified PoNS trainer and were randomized to receive either a high-frequency pulse, or HFP, (25.7 million pulses per 20-minute treatment) or a low-frequency pulse, or LFP, (13,728 pulses per 20-minute treatment) PoNS device. While the HFP and the LFP devices were identical, the frequency of the pulses was different.
Trial Design
All participants provided a prior neuroradiologic report (obtained at least one year after the most recent mmTBI), if available, and completed demographic and quality of life surveys and a medical history during an initial screening visit. Participants who met the initial screening entrance criteria were scheduled for an MRI of the head, a neuropsychiatric evaluation, the SOT to evaluate balance, and a 20-minute walk on the treadmill to evaluate fitness. Key eligibility criteria to participate in the study included the following:
|
• |
Male or female, 18 to 65 years of age. |
|
• |
At least 1-year post most recent mmTBI at the time of screening. |
|
• |
Had participated in a focused physical rehabilitation program for mmTBI and had been deemed by the treating clinician to have reached a plateau. |
|
• |
Had a balance disorder SOT composite score of at least 16 points below the normative value for the participant’s age. |
|
• |
Stable neurologic status, as determined from the participant’s medical records and the trial physician’s opinion based on no new or changing symptoms. |
Participants meeting all the eligibility criteria, and who were not disqualified by exclusion criteria applicable to the trial, were enrolled and randomly assigned in blocks of four to receive an HFP or LFP device. Randomization occurred at each site, according to the randomization plan developed by the clinical research organization. An objective balance assessment was performed using the composite score from the SOT, which measures balance using computerized sensors that objectively measure participants’ ability to maintain balance under six different conditions. The SOT is a widely used measurement tool for balance disorder associated with TBI and was used as the primary efficacy endpoint for the trial. According to published clinical trial data, patients that received physical therapy alone to treat balance deficit related to mmTBI improved by an average of ten to 13 points on the SOT scale, a 0 to 100 scale, and clinical experience shows those patients tend to drift back to baseline levels when physical therapy is discontinued. On average, participants entered the trial with an SOT composite score of approximately 40, which is a score that indicates substantially compromised functional balance. In the trial, an SOT responder was defined as a participant with an improvement of at least 15 points in his/her SOT
8
composite score from baseline to the end of five weeks of PoNS Therapy, a level of change that to our knowledge, has not been achieved in clinical trials of patients with mmTBI-related balance disorder undergoing standard of care physical therapy.
Trial Results
The trial’s statistical analysis plan stated that, if the outcome of the primary effectiveness endpoint showed that PoNS Therapy in the HFP and LFP arms both produced responses of greater than 15 points on the SOT composite score that were not significantly different from one another, the secondary endpoint would be calculated by combining the two groups and comparing the response to baseline at week two and week five. This would imply that both devices had a clinical effect.
The primary effectiveness endpoint demonstrated a trend toward a higher responder rate in the HFP arm (with 71.2% of subjects experiencing a greater than 15 point improvement on the SOT composite score) than in the LFP arm (with 63.5% of subjects experiencing a greater than 15 point improvement on the SOT composite score), p<0.081. The primary effectiveness endpoint was not reached because of the significant therapeutic effect observed in the LFP arm. Because both arms produced responses of greater than 15 points on the SOT composite score that were not significantly different from one another, the secondary effectiveness endpoint was calculated per the statistical analysis plan, as described above. The secondary effectiveness endpoints demonstrated statistically and clinically significant increases in SOT composite scores:
|
o |
The mean improvement at two weeks for the pooled arms was 18.3 points, P<0.0005. |
|
o |
The mean improvement at five weeks for the pooled arms was 24.6 points, P<0.0005. |
Since the majority of patients who have a balance disorder associated with mmTBI are subjected to a higher risk of falls and headaches, the primary safety endpoint was an improvement in the frequency of falls as determined by daily event recording on the participant data case report form during the in-clinic phase of the study (week two). The secondary safety endpoint was the frequency and severity of headaches, as measured by the Headache Disability Index at baseline and at the end of treatment, which was at week five.
|
o |
We successfully met the primary and secondary safety endpoints as measured by a decrease in falls at week two and decrease in headaches at week five, respectively, in both treatment groups. |
|
o |
There were no serious device related adverse events. |
PoNS Long-Term Treatment Trial in mmTBI: A 26-Week Study
This study was performed to understand the durability of response to the PoNS Therapy. This double-blind randomized controlled study in patients with mmTBI was completed in 2017 at the Tactile Communication Neurorehabilitation Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and was sponsored by the U.S. Army. The study was conducted with 22 and 21 participants randomized to the HFP and LFP PoNS Therapy arms, respectively. Participants underwent 14 weeks of active treatment identical in format to the treatment regime in our registrational clinical trial described above, followed by a 12-week washout period when participants discontinued the PoNS Therapy and were told to resume normal daily lifestyles with no specified physical therapy regime. SOT composite scores were captured at specific time points throughout the study, including at 14 weeks and after the 12-week washout (26 weeks).
Highlights of the study results were as follows:
|
o |
There was no statistical difference between the HFP and LFP PoNS Therapy arms mirroring the results of the registrational clinical trial. |
|
o |
On average, participants entered the study with an SOT composite score of approximately 40, which is a score that indicates substantially compromised functional balance. |
|
o |
At the end of 14 weeks of active treatment with the HFP PoNS arm, patients showed improvements on average of 29.8 points on the SOT composite score. |
|
o |
After the 12-week washout period, the participants, on average, maintained the same SOT composite score as after 14 weeks of PoNS Therapy. |
Conclusion:
|
o |
The study demonstrated that the PoNS Therapy could, on average, allow patients with mmTBI who had balance deficit and other injury-related functional disabilities, achieve an SOT composite score in the normal range in 14 weeks and maintain that benefit after a 12-week washout period. We believe that this data supports the durability of the response to the treatment and the potential restoration of the balance system. Furthermore, in a subset of nine participants, sequential magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, scans were performed that showed increased grey matter volume in the cerebellum and elsewhere, commensurate with improved balance. |
Overall Conclusion from the Two mmTBI Trials.
We believe the most significant observations from the two mmTBI trials are:
9
|
• |
Our registrational and long-term treatment trials combined were the largest non-implanted neuromodulation trials in balance and gait deficit due to mmTBI ever performed. |
|
• |
Participants who had a chronic balance disorder resistant to conventional physical therapy were, on average, in the normal range of balance following the 14 weeks of treatment. |
|
• |
The PoNS Therapy in one data set also resulted, on average, in patients maintaining the improvement for at least a 12-week period suggesting a permanent improvement in participants’ balance issues. |
|
• |
There were no differences in clinical outcomes across the clinical trial sites performing both trials. |
|
• |
There were no differences at baseline in age, sex, time from injury, amount of previous physical therapy, level of disability or adherence to therapy in each of the treatment groups. |
|
• |
The difference in therapeutic effect noted between high and low frequency pulse groups may suggest that there was an independent device effect. |
Regulatory Status Worldwide
Canadian Regulatory Status: mmTBI and MS
On October 17, 2018, we received our Canadian marketing authorization from Health Canada allowing us to commercialize the PoNS device in Canada for use as a short-term treatment (14 weeks) of balance deficit due to mmTBI.
On March 18, 2020, we received marketing authorization from Health Canada allowing us to commercialize the PoNS device in Canada for the treatment of gait deficit in patients with mild and moderate MS symptoms. Our market authorization application comprised objective statistical evidence as well as independently reviewed clinical research analysis. This label expansion expanded our addressable market in Canada to include a patient population seeking treatment options that may resolve or delay the progression of MS gait deficit symptoms.
U.S. Regulatory Status: MS
On May 7, 2020, we received Breakthrough Designation for the PoNS device as a potential treatment for gait deficit due to symptoms of MS, to be used as an adjunct to a supervised therapeutic exercise program. The goal of the Breakthrough Devices Program is to provide patients and health care providers with timely access to these medical devices by speeding up their development, assessment, and review, while preserving the statutory standards for premarket approval, 510(k) clearance, and de novo classification and clearance, consistent with FDA’s mission to protect and promote public health.
The Breakthrough Devices Program offers manufacturers an opportunity to interact with the FDA to efficiently address topics as they arise during the premarket review phase, which can help manufacturers receive feedback from the FDA and identify areas of agreement in a timely way. Manufacturers can also expect prioritized review of their submission.
Breakthrough Device Designation does not change the requirements for approval of an application for a marketing authorization.
On March 26, 2021, we received marketing authorization from the FDA of the PoNS device. The PoNS device is indicated for use as a short term treatment of gait deficit due to mild-to-moderate symptoms of MS and is to be used as an adjunct to a supervised therapeutic exercise program in patients 22 years of age and over by prescription only.
On January 14, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued the final rule (CMS-3372-F), 42 C.F.R. § 405.603 on the new Medicare coverage pathway referred to as Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technology, or MCIT, for FDA-designated breakthrough medical devices. The MCIT rule will provide national Medicare coverage as early as the same day as FDA market authorization for breakthrough devices and coverage would last for four years. To be eligible for coverage through MCIT, the breakthrough device must be used for the FDA approved or cleared indication(s) for use. Manufacturers will be able to opt in to MCIT and choose a start date for coverage anytime within two years from the date of FDA market authorization, but coverage will only be valid for four years from market authorization regardless of opt in date. At the end of the four year period, manufacturers are expected to have obtained coding for the specific product which can then be used as the reimbursement pathway for commercial payers. CMS announced MCIT was delayed from becoming effective March 15, 2021 to May 15, 2021 with an additional comment period during that time. On May 14, 2021, CMS announced it further delayed the effective date of the final rule until December 15, 2021 to provide CMS an opportunity to determine appropriate next steps. On September 15, 2021, CMS published a proposal that would repeal the MCIT pathway. Following a 30-day comment period included in the proposal, CMS announced on November 12, 2021 that it was repealing MCIT to address concerns that the provisions in the final rule may have not been sufficient to protect Medicare patients. While we will continue to monitor this, we also remain focused on building out our reimbursement strategy for both commercial and government payers. We are still working to understand current Medicare requirements and policies for coverage, coding, and payment
10
of durable medical equipment and assess how the PoNS device may be treated with respect to coding, coverage, and reimbursement under the Medicare program.
In September 2021, we started activities to setup and implement a new study as part of a Therapeutic Experience Program, or TEP, with NYU Langone Health as our first Center of Excellence clinical site. The TEP is a Helius-sponsored, open label observations, interventional multi-center outcome research trial designed to assess adherence to on-label PoNS therapy for improvement in gait deficits with MS in a real-world clinical setting. The study will measure subjects’ adherence to PoNS therapy, which combines the PoNS device with physical therapy, to better understand the relationship between adherence to the treatment regimen and therapeutic functional outcome. The primary endpoint of the study is maintenance of gait improvement from the end of supervised therapy (Phase 1) to the end of unsupervised therapy (Phase 2) in relation to the subject’s adherence to PoNS therapy. The secondary endpoints are improvement of gait and balance deficit over time, and clinical global impression of change. The study will be conducted at ten to twelve Centers of Excellence across the U.S., with an estimated average of four PoNS devices per site. Enrollment is expected to commence in first half of 2022 and continue throughout the year. Approximately forty to fifty patients with MS are expected to participate in the study.
U.S. Regulatory Status: Stroke
In August 2021, we received Breakthrough Designation for the PoNS device as a potential treatment for dynamic gait and balance deficits due to symptoms from stroke, to be used as an adjunct to a supervised therapeutic exercise program in patients 22 years of age and over. With Breakthrough Designation received, a clinical trial of PoNS therapy in stroke patients in collaboration with Medical University of South Carolina is planned to commence in the second quarter of 2022 with initial patient enrollments beginning in the second half of 2022.
U.S. Regulatory Status: mmTBI
Our U.S. regulatory strategy initially focused on pursuing de novo classification and clearance of the PoNS device from the FDA for the treatment of balance deficit due to mmTBI.
We submitted a request for de novo classification and clearance of the PoNS device to the FDA for this indication in August 2018. This request was supported by data from two of our clinical trials in mmTBI, including our registrational trial, TBI-001.
In April 2019, we announced that the FDA had completed its review and had denied our request for de novo classification and clearance of the PoNS device for the treatment of balance deficit due to mmTBI. In reaching its conclusion, the FDA noted, via a denial letter, that although the safety profile of the PoNS device is acceptable, the FDA did not have sufficient information to discern the relative independent contributions of the PoNS device and physical therapy on the improvements from baseline. The FDA noted that we could generate additional data to address its concerns and resubmit our application.
In October 2019, we had a pre-submission meeting where the FDA provided feedback needed to help complete the design of a new clinical trial intended to address the FDA’s request for a trial that demonstrates the benefit of the PoNS Therapy compared to physical therapy alone. In January 2020, we received the FDA’s feedback on the minutes from the October 2019 pre-submission meeting. In its feedback, the FDA provided post-meeting notes with specific recommendations regarding the trial design that were not discussed in the October 2019 pre-submission meeting.
Based on the receipt of the FDA’s final minutes from the pre-submission meeting, we are assessing the feasibility of a clinical program to advance the development of a study aimed to obtain clearance for gait and balance deficits in mmTBI if nondilutive financing to fund the program becomes available.
European Regulatory Status
In December 2018, we submitted an application for a CE Mark, which, if approved, would allow us to market the PoNS device in the EU. During the second quarter of 2019, we engaged with regulators in Europe to answer questions that we received from them as part of their review of our PoNS device for CE marking. In August 2019, we withdrew our application from the EU marketing process due to uncertainty in Europe caused by the switch from the Medical Device Directive, or MDD, to the Medical Device Regulation, or MDR, Brexit, and the withdrawal of Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance, our notified body, from the EU notified body business. We have engaged G-MED NA (North America) as our new ISO registrar and will reconsider submitting to the EU when conditions stabilize.
11
Australian Regulatory Status
In the third quarter of 2019, we initiated the submission of our application to the Therapeutic Goods Administration, or TGA. We supplemented our submission with additional data based on questions supplied to date and provided responses to additional questions during the third quarter of 2020. In November 2021, we received market authorization from the TGA for the sale of PoNS as a Class IIa medical device. In Australia, PoNS is intended for short term use by healthcare professionals as an adjunct to a therapeutic exercise program to improve balance and gait. PoNS is not intended to be used alone without an exercise program. We are working to establish a distribution partner for Australia but currently do not expect to have commercial sales of PoNS in Australia in 2022.
Partnerships and Agreements
Canadian Strategic Alliance
On October 30, 2019, we and Health Tech Connex, Inc., or HTC entered into a Share Purchase Agreement, or the SPA, whereby we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, acquired Heuro from HTC. Under the terms of the SPA, total consideration of approximately $1.6 million was paid to HTC, which included (1) the repayment to HTC for their investment in the set-up of Heuro’s initial commercial infrastructure including the establishment of five authorized PoNS clinics across Canada, (2) the current market value of 55 PoNS devices which we also are to provide to HTC under the SPA, (3) the CAD$750 thousand receivable from the September 2018 strategic alliance agreement and (4) the sale of exclusivity rights granted to HTC in the Co-Promotion Agreement, as defined below, to provide PoNS Therapy in the Fraser Valley and Vancouver metro regions of British Columbia.
In connection with the Share Purchase Agreement, on October 30, 2019, we entered into a Clinical Research and Co-Promotion Agreement with HTC, or the Co-Promotion Agreement, whereby each company will promote the sales of the PoNS Therapy and the NeuroCatchTM device throughout Canada. The co-promotion arrangement terminated in accordance with its terms on December 31, 2020. Also, subject to certain terms and conditions, we granted to HTC the exclusive right to provide the PoNS Therapy in the Fraser Valley and Vancouver metro regions of British Columbia, where HTC has operated a PoNS authorized clinic since February 2019. HTC will purchase the PoNS devices for use in these regions exclusively from us and on terms no less favorable than the then-current standard terms and conditions. On January 31, 2022, we notified HTC of its material breaches under the Co-Promotion Agreement, which HTC failed to cure under the terms of the Co-Promotion Agreement, and as such, it is our position that this exclusivity right is no longer in effect.
Product Development, Manufacturing and Logistics Services
In January 2017, we entered into an agreement with Cambridge Consultants LLC, or Cambridge, pursuant to which Cambridge assumed responsibilities for key aspects of the design and development of the PoNS device. As part of the agreement, Cambridge validated the performance of the engineering, design verification testing and product documentation to support our FDA submission. Cambridge also assisted us in the identification of, and transition to, our commercial-scale manufacturer.
On December 29, 2017, we selected Keytronic Corporation, or Keytronic, as our contract-manufacturing partner for the PoNS device after a competitive selection process. The commercial design of the PoNS device is manufactured and assembled at Keytronic’s facility located in Oakdale, Minnesota. Keytronic manufactured devices for engineering and design verification testing and for our FDA submission as well as commercial devices for launch inventory. Keytronic has multiple locations across the U.S., Mexico and China with back-up manufacturing capabilities to help mitigate the risk of a single source provider. We remain ultimately responsible for the compliance of our submissions and products, and activities performed on our behalf.
We place an emphasis on protecting our patented technology, trade secrets and know-how and only share confidential information on an as needed basis. Keytronic is registered as a medical device manufacturer in good standing with the FDA and along with Cambridge are certified in accordance with International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, 13485, a comprehensive quality management system for the design and manufacture of medical devices. HMI maintains a compliant quality management system certified to ISO 13485:2016 and compliant with MDSAP requirements for the U.S., Canada and Australia.
In July 2021, we entered into a contract with Healthlink International Inc. to provide third party logistics for domestic and Canadian shipment and order fulfillment, and to provide warehousing services for finished goods. Healthlink is a life science solutions company, specializing in logistics, temperature-controlled warehousing, fulfillment and freight management as well as back-office services, including multilingual customer service, financial services and VAT management.
Commercialization
12
Canadian Commercialization Efforts
In March 2019, we commenced the commercialization of our PoNS Therapy in Canada, where PoNS became the first and only device authorized by Health Canada for the treatment of balance deficit due to mmTBI. Throughout 2019, we made important progress in advancing and refining our commercialization strategy in Canada building access, awareness and credibility for the PoNS Therapy, including the acquisition of the Heuro Canada operating entity of HTC. These efforts, which were led by our local Canadian commercial team, included the establishment of our authorized clinic network throughout Canada, launching digital marketing campaigns, and building key opinion leader and advocacy networks.
On March 18, 2020, the Company received notification that its Canadian Class II license amendment application for the treatment of gait deficit in patients with mild and moderate symptoms from MS, when used in conjunction with physical therapy, was successful and received marketing authorization for PoNS from Health Canada.
Following in-depth market analysis and field intelligence, our Canadian commercial team began an expansion plan to increase the number of authorized PoNS clinics. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we authorized 6 new clinical locations to have 37 clinic locations across Canada as of December 31, 2021. In addition to continuing to increase the number of clinic locations, we have shifted our focus to driving patient throughput to these clinics. Sales performance in Canada continues to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic due to space restrictions that the provincial governments have imposed as well as the risk tolerance of patients and therapists.
In collaboration with Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (part of University Health Network) we are continuing our clinical experience program, the results of which we will look to publish in 2022.
We continue to refine our go-to-market pricing model. In 2020, we implemented a modified pricing approach which is focused on reducing the need for clinics and patients to pay large, upfront costs at the start of treatment. We have also experimented with various promotional pricing programs resulting in lower unit prices for both PoNS system purchases and mouthpieces in order to increase access to the PoNS Therapy and drive market awareness which we believe resulted in an increase in the volume of units sold, beginning in the second half of 2020. We extended the promotional pricing through the end of 2021 including any order placed and accepted, but not fulfilled before December 31, 2021. The promotional pricing was discontinued in 2022 when new pricing was established.
The value dossiers for mmTBI and MS that were created in mid-2020 to fully demonstrate in both scientific and financial terms, the merits of PoNS Therapy for claimants are now being utilized along with submissions from clinics on behalf of their patients. The dossiers are provided to our clinics across Canada to submit as part of treatment plans with reimbursement applications to the payer community. Our reimbursement strategy for mmTBI is focused initially on the auto collision insurance and workers’ compensation, or WC, market as well as long-term disability cases. Our reimbursement strategy for MS is focused on commercial insurers/extended health benefits.
As part of our overall PoNS Therapy strategy, we are also gathering comprehensive health economic assessments of treatment outcomes. These data will, in-turn, be used to support our applications for WC, auto insurance and commercial insurance reimbursement initiatives in Canada, the U.S. and other markets around the world. We believe the Canadian commercial experience will be extremely valuable to prepare us for our launches in the U.S. and internationally.
The real-world results from the collective experience of our patients that have completed the 14-week PoNS Therapy, in Canada thus far, have been encouraging. Consistent with what we observed in our two clinical trials, one for 5 weeks and the other for 14 weeks, commercial MS and mmTBI patients demonstrated improvements in balance and gait within the first two weeks followed by continued improvement over the following twelve weeks. The majority of patients had a mean patient adherence to treatment of over 90% and showed significant improvement in their balance and gait with a meaningful clinical difference at the end of their treatment. The consistency of the patient results from our initial commercial experience supports our plans to expand access PoNS Therapy in Canada.
U.S. Commercialization Activities
As previously stated, on March 26, 2021, we received marketing authorization from the FDA for the PoNS device. The PoNS device is indicated for use as a short term treatment of gait deficit due to mild-to-moderate symptoms of MS and is to be used as an adjunct to a supervised therapeutic exercise program in patients 22 years of age and over by prescription only.
Throughout the pre-commercial phase during 2021, we developed and refined our commercial strategy including a focus on payer strategy, both government and commercial, securing distribution licenses in various states and beginning to build relationships with key large neurorehabilitation centers, which focus on treatment of MS patients. We continue to generate data on outcomes of the PoNS Therapy generated from treatment of patients in Canada and ensuring that our scientific data is presented at many of the key national and international neurology and neuromodulation meetings. We believe this scientific dissemination may begin to pave the way to establishing the PoNS Therapy as the standard of care for the treatment of MS-related gait deficit.
13
We are currently accepting prescriptions for PoNS in the United States, and we anticipate our first commercial sales in the near term. We have targeted specific Key Opinion Leaders (i.e., neurologists and physiatrists) and their associated neurorehabilitation centers, where selected physical therapists will be trained to deliver the PoNS Therapy. Importantly, this focused strategy will also allow us to measure patient outcomes to determine if they are similar to those observed in our clinical trials. To further develop and implement the PoNS commercialization strategy, we have hired a Vice President of Sales and Marketing, North America, have identified the initial launch areas within the U.S., and we have continued to build out our commercial team, including field sales, reimbursement specialists, and marketing and operational support commensurate with PoNS sales activity.
During 2021, we contracted with an industry consultant to conduct a health economic study of PoNS. Based upon the results of this study and comparing PoNS to other medical devices utilizing similar patented technologies, we established a U.S. list price for the PoNS device of $25,700, comprised of $17,800 for the controller and $7,900 for the mouthpiece. We are pursuing commercial insurance coverage and Medicare reimbursement for PoNS within the Durable Medical Equipment, or DME, benefit category. While there are currently no applicable Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, or HCPCS, codes to describe the PoNS device or mouthpiece, we intend to use miscellaneous codes – E1399 (Miscellaneous durable medical equipment) and A9999 (Miscellaneous DME supply or accessory, not otherwise specified) until specific HCPCS codes are created. We have applied for unique HCPCS codes during the third quarter of 2021, which is a nine month process from application until coding is to be effective, if assigned. We also intend to provide broad access and reimbursement for the PoNS Therapy over time through commercial insurers. Prior to the initiation of CMS or broad commercial payer coverage, we anticipate the primary source of sales will be self-pay patients. We expect to support the cost of the PoNS Therapy by offering a cash pay discount, collaborating with third parties to provide self-pay patients with financing options as well as working with advocacy groups and charitable organizations to help self-pay patients access our technology. In general, we anticipate that it will take at least 24 months to obtain broad coverage and reimbursement among government and private payers.
Commercialization in Other Markets
We submitted an application for a CE Mark in December 2018. In preparation for our launch in the United Kingdom, or UK, and the EU, we entered into a consulting agreement with a UK-based company with expertise in the development of new services in the healthcare industry to leverage local market insights to develop a comprehensive commercialization strategy and tactical plan for launch of the PoNS Therapy in the UK. As previously described, in August 2019, we withdrew our application for EU market authorization and will revisit our UK and EU commercialization plans as terms of market authorization become clearer under the new regulations.
We submitted an application to the TGA in Australia during the third quarter of 2019. We supplemented our submission with additional data based on questions supplied to date and provided responses to additional questions during the third quarter of 2020. In November 2021, we received market authorization from the TGA for the sale of PoNS as a Class IIa medical device. In Australia, PoNS is authorized as a non-implanted neurostimulator intended for short term used by healthcare professionals as an adjunct to a therapeutic exercise program to improve balance and gait. PoNS is not intended to be used alone without an exercise program. We are working to establish a distribution partner for Australia but currently do not expect to have commercial sales of PoNS in Australia in 2022.
COVID-19 Pandemic
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 as a global pandemic, which has spread throughout the U.S. and around the world. The Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition have been and may continue to be adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and global economic conditions. The outbreak and spread of COVID-19 has significantly increased economic uncertainty. Authorities implemented, and continue to implement, numerous measures to try to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place orders, and business shutdowns. The COVID-19 pandemic initially led to the closure of PoNS authorized clinic locations across Canada from March until June 2020. Patients who completed their initial training in the clinics prior to the closures were able to continue working independently in the at-home portion of the treatment, with remote check-ins with their certified therapists. While all clinics have re-opened, as of December 31, 2021, they were all operating at reduced capacity, which limited operations to 50% capacity during the second half of 2021. Some patients have begun to return to these clinics for treatment, but patients have been and may continue to be less willing to return to the clinics due to COVID-19, impacting our commercial activities and our customer engagement efforts. This was especially true in the first half of 2021, as cases of COVID-19 increased significantly in Canada and additional restrictions, shelter in place orders, and business shutdowns were imposed. The rate of vaccination increased throughout all provinces throughout 2021, facilitating the lifting of some of the previously imposed restrictions. Thus far during the first quarter of 2022, capacity has remained at the 50% threshold with the expectation that the capacity limit will increase as provinces continue to lift restrictions. We continue to monitor the impact of COVID-19 and adjust our operations as the circumstances change.
We have expanded our services to include remote training and treatment, but the long-term viability of these remote programs is still being assessed. Additionally, current and planned clinical experience programs and clinical trials in Canada have experienced and may
14
continue to experience delays in the programs as trial participant attendance has generally decreased as a result of the pandemic, and clinics and clinical research sites have experienced delays and difficulties in recruiting and re-hiring clinical site staff.
The COVID-19 pandemic has and may continue to cause delays in or the suspension of our business partners manufacturing operations, our research and product development activities, our regulatory workstreams, our research and development activities and other important commercial functions. We are also dependent upon our suppliers for the manufacture of our PoNS device. In the second quarter of 2020, two of our business partners diverted resources towards other activities related to COVID-19, resulting in delays in our product development activities. Such diversion of suppliers’ resources may occur again in the future, and the pandemic could limit our suppliers’ ability to travel or ship materials or force temporary closure of facilities that we rely upon. Manufacturing delays have occurred and may also occur as the result of labor shortages. Two of our suppliers experienced significant labor shortages as a result of COVID-19 from the end of November 2021 through early January 2022 which reduced the available resources needed to build and test product which may delay the timing for the submission and approval of our marketing applications with regulatory agencies. Further, the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could affect our ability to access the public markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly capitalize and continue our operations.
The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact our business, including our U.S. commercial launch and sales in Canada, as well as our results of operations and our financial condition will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. We do not yet know the full extent of the impact of COVID-19 on our business, operations or the global economy as a whole.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Canadian Reimbursement
We believe that traditional life and health payers may be among the earliest to provide coverage and reimbursement for the PoNS Therapy, and therefore, we are focusing on gaining coverage for the PoNS Therapy through them. Life and health encompasses long- and short-term disability claims. Because these payers are responsible for both medical expenses and lost wages, they have an incentive to seek ways to help injured employees to return to work. As part of our commercial treatment program in Canada, we will collect both outcomes and return to work data, which we plan to utilize with life and health, provincial workers compensation insurance programs, and property and casualty insurers to demonstrate both the clinical and economic value associated with the PoNS Therapy.
U.S. Reimbursement
In the U.S., we plan to engage with select payer segments to obtain coverage and reimbursement for the PoNS Therapy. We intend to combine evidence from our clinical trials and real-world experience from commercial clinics in Canada to demonstrate the value proposition of the PoNS Therapy to payers and support favorable coverage and reimbursement decisions.
On January 14, 2021, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued the final rule (CMS-3372-F), 42 C.F.R. § 405.603 on the new Medicare coverage pathway referred to as Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technology, or MCIT, for FDA-designated breakthrough medical devices. The purpose of the MCIT rule was to provide national Medicare coverage as early as the same day as FDA market authorization for breakthrough devices and coverage would last for four years. On September 15, 2021, CMS published a proposal that would repeal the MCIT pathway. Following a 30-day comment period included in the proposal, CMS announced on November 12, 2021 that it was rescinding the MCIT final rule to address concerns that the provisions in the final rule may have not been sufficient to protect Medicare patients. While we will continue to monitor this, we also remain focused on building out our reimbursement strategy for both commercial and government payers. We continue to work with Medicare requirements and policies for coverage, coding, and payment of durable medical equipment and assess how the PoNS device may be treated with respect to coding, coverage, and reimbursement under the Medicare program.
Competition
The neurostimulation market is predominantly comprised of surgically implanted, invasive technologies that are not directly competitive with our technology. Several neurostimulation companies are large, publicly-traded companies that have a history in the market, have significantly easier access to capital and other resources and have an established product pipeline. The combined clinical research and product development done by the industry, including by us and all of our competitors, is uncovering the beneficial effects of neurostimulation which now establishes neuromodulation as a valid and scientifically supported approach to the treatment of neurological conditions, and accordingly, we expect for competition in the non-implanted space to grow in the future.
However, we believe that we will have the first-mover advantage in the non-implanted neurostimulation space.
15
We believe that the PoNS Therapy introduces an innovative target and method of stimulation, because targeting the tongue for neurostimulation provides several advantages that competitively distinguish the PoNS Therapy, which are discussed below.
Advantages of the PoNS Therapy
We believe that the PoNS Therapy offers the following benefits over existing neurostimulation technologies:
|
• |
The PoNS Therapy stimulates the trigeminal nerve which developing science has implicated to be beneficial in some neurological disorder models. The PoNS Therapy stimulates the lingual part of the nerve through the tongue, while other technologies stimulate other branches of the trigeminal nerve. It is the largest branch, having the highest amount of nerve fibers of the three branches. We believe this will be an advantage in our therapy. |
|
• |
Stimulating the tongue also allows for the simultaneous stimulation of a second cranial nerve found in the tongue, the facial nerve. The ability to stimulate more than one nerve alone differentiates us from our competition. However, it has not been scientifically proven that stimulating additional nerves adds to the efficacy or safety of the PoNS Therapy. |
|
• |
The tongue has an anatomically unique surface with a high density of receptors, a consistently moist and conductive environment, constant pH, constant temperature and a direct connection to the brain through at least two cranial nerves. |
|
• |
Scientific studies suggest that the trigeminal cranial nerves offer a high-bandwidth pathway for impulses to directly affect the central nervous system. The trigeminal nerves project directly onto several areas of the brain, primarily the brainstem (trigeminal and solitary nuclei), cerebellum, cochlear nuclei and spinal cord. Secondary targets include the limbic system, basal ganglia and thalamus. We believe that this range of projections will allow impulses to be sent through sites regulating dozens of functions. |
|
• |
Unlike deep brain stimulation devices, implantable vagal nerve devices and other invasive forms of electrical stimulation, the tongue allows for neurostimulation to be delivered via a portable, non-implanted device. This allows for the integration of neurostimulation with a wide range of therapies previously unexplored for neurological rehabilitation. |
16
Intellectual Property
Licensed Intellectual Property
Pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Patent Sub-License, or the Sublicense Agreement, dated June 6, 2014 entered into between Advanced NeuroRehabilitation LLC, or ANR, and HMI, ANR has granted HMI a worldwide, exclusive license to make, have made, use, lease and sell devices utilizing certain patent applications, which are collectively referred to as the “Patent Pending Rights.” The Patent Pending Rights relate to the PoNS device and include the following patents and patent applications, which cover a device that noninvasively delivers neurostimulation through the skin or intra-orally to the brain stem via various nerves including the trigeminal and facial nerves:
U.S. Patent Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
U.S. Patent No. |
|
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
|
12/348,301 |
|
1/4/2009 |
|
Issued |
|
|
8,849,407 |
|
|
9/30/2014 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation of the skin combined with simultaneous physical therapy to provide neurorehabilitation of a patient to treat various maladies including, e.g., TBI, stroke and Alzheimer’s disease |
14/340,144 |
|
7/24/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
8,909,345 |
|
|
12/9/2014 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation within a patient’s mouth combined with physical therapy to provide neurorehabilitation of a patient to treat various maladies including, e.g., TBI, stroke, and Alzheimer’s disease |
14/341,141 |
|
7/25/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,020,612 |
|
|
4/28/2015 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation within a patient’s mouth combined with cognitive therapy to provide neurorehabilitation of a patient resulting in improved reading comprehension and increased attention span as well as the treatment various maladies including, but not limited to, TBI, stroke, and Alzheimer’s disease |
14/615,766 |
|
2/6/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,656,078 |
|
|
5/23/2017 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation within a patient’s mouth combined with stimulation of the patient’s vision, hearing, vestibular systems, or somatosensory systems for the treatment of tinnitus |
14/689,462 |
|
4/17/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
9,597,501 |
|
|
3/21/2017 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation of a patient’s skin combined with cognitive therapy to provide neurorehabilitation of a patient resulting in improved reading comprehension and increased attention span as well as the treatment various maladies including, e.g., TBI, stroke, and Alzheimer’s disease |
|
14/815,171 |
|
7/31/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,597,504 |
|
|
3/21/2017 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation of a patient’s mouth combined with therapy to provide neurorehabilitation of a patient, with a focus on features of a neurostimulation device |
15/207,029 |
|
7/11/2016 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,656,069 |
|
|
5/23/2017 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation of a subject’s oral cavity while the subject engages in an exercise in order to enhance a subject’s proficiency in the exercise |
15/283,894 |
|
10/3/2016 |
|
Issued |
|
|
10,293,163 |
|
|
5/21/2019 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation of a subject’s oral cavity or skin while the subject engages in a physical or cognitive exercise in order to enhance a subject’s proficiency in the exercise |
15/602,060 |
|
5/22/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
|
10,328,263 |
|
|
6/25/2019 |
|
non-invasive neurostimulation within a patient’s mouth or on a patient’s skin combined with an exercise for treatment of a disorder affecting sleep patterns |
16/376,595 |
|
4/5/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
|
11,185,696 |
|
|
11/30/2021 |
|
Utility patent application covering non-invasive neurostimulation of a subject's oral cavity or skin while the subject engages in a physical or cognitive exercise in order to enhance a subject's proficiency in the exercise |
16/450,915 |
|
6/24/2019 |
|
Allowed |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
Non-invasive neurostimulation of a subject's oral cavity or skin while the subject engages in a physical or cognitive exercise in order to enhance a subject's proficiency in the exercise |
17
61/019,061 (Provisional) |
|
1/4/2008 |
|
Expired |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
61/020,265 (Provisional) |
|
1/10/2008 |
|
Expired |
|
N/A |
|
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
U.S. Patent Nos. 8,909,345; 9,020,612; 9,656,078; 9,597,501; 9,597,504; 9,656,069; 10,293,163; 10,328,263; and 11,185,696 claim priority to U.S. Patent No. 8,849,407.
A U.S. provisional patent application provides the means to establish an early effective filing date for a later filed nonprovisional patent application. Therefore, though the two provisional applications have expired, they establish a priority date for U.S. Patent Nos. 8,909,345; 9,020,612; 9,656,078; 9,597,501; 9,597,504; 9,656,069; 10,293,163; 10,328,263; and 11,185,696, and any future filings that claim priority. We intend to file additional continuation applications in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/019,061 and 61/020,265 to protect other aspects of the PoNS device and related non-invasive neurostimulation techniques.
ANR holds an interest in the Patent Pending Rights pursuant to an exclusive license from the inventors. U.S. Patent Nos. 8,909,345; 9,020,612; 9,656,078; 9,597,501; 9,597,504; 9,656,069; 10,293,163; 10,328,263; and 11,185,696 are included in the exclusive license as the exclusive license agreement covers (i) U.S. Patent Application No. 12/348,301 (now U.S. Patent No. 8,849,407) and Provisional Application No. 61/019,061, (ii) any patents issuing therefrom and (iii) any patents claiming priority to U.S. Patent Application No. 12/348,301 or Provisional Application No. 61/019,061, which U.S. Patent Nos. 8,909,345; 9,020,612; 9,656,078; 9,597,501; 9,597,504; 9,656,069; 10,293,163; 10,328,263; and 11,185,696 claim priority through such provisional application as well as through Provisional Application 61/020,265.
In addition, ANR has agreed that ownership of any improvements, enhancements or derivative works of the Patent Pending Rights that are developed by HMI or ANR shall be owned by HMI, provided that if HMI decides not to patent such improvements, ANR may choose to pursue patent rights independently. Pursuant to the Sublicense Agreement, HMI has agreed to pay ANR royalties equal to 4% of HMI’s revenues collected from the sale of devices covered by the Patent Pending Rights and services related to the therapy or use of devices covered by the Patent Pending Rights in therapy services. The Sublicense Agreement provides that the sublicense granted by ANR to HMI, if in good standing, shall not be cancelled; limited or impaired in any way should there be a termination of the master license granted by the inventors to ANR, which was acknowledged by the inventors in the Sublicense Agreement. On June 6, 2014, HMI and ANR entered into a second amended and restated sublicense agreement, or the Second Sublicense Agreement, which acknowledges the Reverse Merger (see “Our Corporate History - Acquisition of Helius Medical, Inc and Concurrent Financing” below) and adds us as a party to the agreement.
The license of the Patent Pending Rights is subject to the right of the government of the United States, which funded certain research relating to the development of the PoNS device, to a nonexclusive, non-transferable, irrevocable, paid up license to use the Patent Pending Rights for governmental purposes. In addition, HMI has granted a perpetual, royalty-free license to the Patent Pending Rights back to ANR for non-profit research and development activities, which do not compete with HMI’s business and to produce and derive revenues from devices and services in connection with investigational uses of the PoNS device and related technology.
The license of the Patent Pending Rights is also subject to the terms of the CRADA. In the event that we are not willing or unable to commercialize the PoNS technology within four years from the expiration of the CRADA, the Company is required to transfer possession, ownership and sponsorship/holdership of the regulation application, regulatory correspondence and supporting regulatory information related technology to USAMRMC and grant the U.S. Government a non-exclusive, irrevocable license to any patent, copyright, data rights, proprietary information or regulatory information for the U.S. Government to commercialize the technology.
Company Owned Intellectual Property
As of March 7, 2022, we have filed 36 U.S. patent applications related to various technical and ornamental aspects of the PoNS device: 15 non-provisional patent applications that describe various technical features in the current version device and 21 design patent applications describing various ornamental designs. We are the sole assignee for these 36 U.S. patent filings. In addition to the first issued patent (U.S. Patent No. 9,072,889), the USPTO has issued 14 utility patents and 21 design patents as summarized in the table below:
18
U.S. Patent Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
U.S. Patent No. |
|
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
|
14/558,768 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,072,889 |
|
|
7/7/2015 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece |
14/559,123 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,272,133 |
|
|
3/1/2016 |
|
Utility patent covering strain relief mechanisms for the connection between the mouthpiece and the controller |
14/558,787 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,227,051 |
|
|
1/5/2016 |
|
Utility patent covering shape of the mouthpiece |
14/558,789 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,283,377 |
|
|
3/15/2016 |
|
Utility patent covering center of gravity of the mouthpiece |
14/559,080 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,415,209 |
|
|
8/16/2016 |
|
Utility patent covering structural support of the mouthpiece |
14/559,105 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,415,210 |
|
|
8/16/2016 |
|
Utility patent covering glue wells of the mouthpiece |
14/727,100 |
|
6/1/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,616,222 |
|
|
4/11/2017 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mechanical details of the mouthpiece |
14/558,775 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,981,127 |
|
|
5/29/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering aspects of the controller |
14/558,784 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,789,306 |
|
|
10/17/2017 |
|
Utility patent covering authentication techniques |
14/559,045 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,993,640 |
|
|
6/12/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering the locators of the mouthpiece |
14/559,118 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
|
9,656,060 |
|
|
5/23/2017 |
|
Utility patent covering methods of manufacturing the mouthpiece |
15/484,077 |
|
4/10/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
|
10,258,790 |
|
|
4/16/2019 |
|
Utility application covering overall system design, including controller and mechanical details of the mouthpiece |
15/602,055 |
|
5/22/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
|
10,463,850 |
|
|
11/5/2019 |
|
Utility application covering methods of manufacturing the mouthpiece |
16/005,624 |
|
6/11/2018 |
|
Issued |
|
|
10,709,887 |
|
|
7/14/2020 |
|
Utility patent application covering methods of placing a mouthpiece in a patient’s mouth prior to engaging in NINM |
16/384,016 |
|
4/15/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
|
11,197,994 |
|
|
12/14/2021 |
|
Utility patent application covering overall system design, including controller and mechanical details of the mouthpiece, where controller and mouthpiece communicate wirelessly |
29/510,741 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D750264 |
|
|
2/23/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative version of the current PoNS device (over-ear double boom design) |
|
29/510,742 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D749746 |
|
|
2/16/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative version of the current PoNS device (overhead minimal interference design) |
|
29/510,743 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D752236 |
|
|
3/22/2016 |
|
Design patent covering system design used in the current PoNS device |
|
29/510,745 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D750265 |
|
|
2/23/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
19
U.S. Patent Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
U.S. Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
29/510,754 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D750794 |
|
3/1/2016 |
|
Design patent covering the controller used in the PoNS device |
29/510,755 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D751214 |
|
3/8/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative controller not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,746 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D750266 |
|
2/23/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,749 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D750268 |
|
2/23/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,747 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D751213 |
|
3/8/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,748 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D750267 |
|
2/23/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,750 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D753315 |
|
4/5/2016 |
|
Design patent covering mouthpiece used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,751 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D751722 |
|
3/15/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative controller not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,752 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D752766 |
|
3/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative controller not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,753 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D753316 |
|
4/5/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative controller not used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,744 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D760397 |
|
6/28/2016 |
|
Design patent covering alternative system design used in the current PoNS device |
29/510,756 |
|
12/3/2014 |
|
Issued |
|
D759830 |
|
6/21/2016 |
|
Design patent covering alternative system design used in the current PoNS device |
29/681,984 |
|
2/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
D891084 |
|
7/28/2020 |
|
Design patent covering mouthpiece retainer case design used in the current PoNS device |
29/681,990 |
|
2/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
D894601 |
|
9/1/2020 |
|
Design patent covering carry case design used in the current PoNS device |
29/682,001 |
|
2/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
D907221 |
|
1/5/2021 |
|
Design patent covering alternative system design used in the current PoNS device |
29/681,993 |
|
2/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
D927005 |
|
8/3/2021 |
|
Design patent covering alternative system design used in the current PoNS device |
29/681,997 |
|
2/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
D916300 |
|
4/13/2021 |
|
Design patent covering alternative system design used in the current PoNS device |
In addition to our U.S. patents, we have been granted 20 foreign utility patents (nine in Australia, five in Russia, one in Canada, two in Israel, two in Europe (validated in France, Germany, Italy, UK and Spain) and one in Eurasia, or EA (validated in all eight Eurasian
20
member-states), and 33 foreign design patents (three in Australia, nine in Canada, six in Russia, and fifteen registered community designs in Europe), as detailed in the tables below.
Foreign Utility Patents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Australian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2015355211 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2015355211 |
|
11/16/2017 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mechanical details of the mouthpiece |
2015355212 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2015355212 |
|
12/21/2017 |
|
Utility patent covering center of gravity of the mouthpiece |
2017218934 |
|
8/21/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
2017218934 |
|
1/3/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mechanical details of the mouthpiece |
2017276270 |
|
12/14/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
2017276270 |
|
6/28/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering authentication techniques |
2018204184 |
|
6/12/2018 |
|
Issued |
|
2018204184 |
|
10/25/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering aspects of the controller |
2017228517 |
|
9/11/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
2017228517 |
|
1/24/2019 |
|
Utility application covering the shape of the mouthpiece |
2018247259 |
|
10/11/2018 |
|
Issued |
|
2018247259 |
|
11/28/2019 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece, and authentication techniques |
2019200175 |
|
1/10/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
2019200175 |
|
10/24/2019 |
|
Utility patent covering the locators of the mouthpiece |
2019246836 |
|
10/10/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
2019246836 |
|
12/14/2021 |
|
Utility patent covering methods for placing a mouthpiece in a patient's mouth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Canadian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2969729 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2969729 |
|
10/26/2021 |
|
Utility application covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece, and authentication techniques |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eurasian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Eurasian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
201790009 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
28551 (validated in 8 EA states) |
|
11/30/2017 |
|
Utility patent covering methods for non-invasively aiding neurorehabilitation using intraoral stimulation in combination with an exercise regimen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
European Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
15813638.2 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
3226962 |
|
7/3/2019 |
|
Utility application covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece |
15812899.1 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
3226961 |
|
8/7/2019 |
|
Utility application covering shape of the mouthpiece |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Russian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2017123125 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2649512 |
|
4/3/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece |
2017123041 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2652571 |
|
4/26/2016 |
|
Design patent covering the controller design currently used in the PoNS device |
2018108570 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2665385 |
|
8/29/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering center of gravity of the mouthpiece |
2018129619 |
|
8/14/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
2686950 |
|
5/6/2019 |
|
Utility patent covering authentication techniques |
2018112065 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
2686044 |
|
4/23/2019 |
|
Utility patent covering center of gravity of the mouthpiece |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israeli Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Israeli Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
252649 |
|
6/4/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
252649 |
|
12/21/2018 |
|
Utility patent covering center of gravity of the mouthpiece |
252648 |
|
6/1/2017 |
|
Issued |
|
252648 |
|
8/31/2019 |
|
Utility patent covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece |
21
Foreign Design Patents
Russian Design Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Russian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2015501883 |
|
6/3/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
98981 |
|
7/16/2016 |
|
Design patent covering the system design currently used in the PoNS device |
2015501882 |
|
6/3/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
99240 |
|
8/16/2016 |
|
Design patent covering the mouthpiece design currently used in the PoNS device |
2015501881 |
|
6/3/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
98947 |
|
7/16/2016 |
|
Design patent covering the controller design currently used in the PoNS device |
Canadian Design Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Canadian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
162676 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162676 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering system design used in the current PoNS device |
162672 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162672 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
162671 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162671 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative mouthpiece not used in the current PoNS device |
162674 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162674 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering mouthpiece used in the current PoNS device |
162675 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162675 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering an alternative controller not used in the current PoNS device |
162670 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162670 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering the controller used in the PoNS device |
162673 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
162673 |
|
2/29/2016 |
|
Design patent covering system design used in the current PoNS device |
EU Community Design Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
EU Community Design Reg. No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
002712026 |
|
6/2/2015 |
|
Issued |
|
002712026-0001 - 002712026-0007 |
|
9/4/2015 |
|
Design patents covering several aspects of the system design currently used in the PoNS device |
006753877 |
|
8/23/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
006753877-0001 – 006753877-0008 |
|
11/21/2019 |
|
Design patents covering the controller design used in the PoNS device |
Australian Design Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Australian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
201914827 |
|
8/26/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
201914827 |
|
10/8/2019 |
|
Design patent covering system design used in the PoNS device |
201914900 |
|
8/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
201914900 |
|
10/24/2019 |
|
Design patent covering the controller design used in the PoNS device |
201914906 |
|
8/28/2019 |
|
Issued |
|
201914906 |
|
10/23/2019 |
|
Design patent covering the mouthpiece design used in the PoNS device |
22
Further, we have 13 foreign utility patent applications that are currently pending: three in Europe, two in each of Australia, Canada and Russia and one in each of China, Israel, and the U.K., and one design patent application that is currently pending in Canada:
Australian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Australian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2020228618 |
|
2/26/2020 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering computer systems and methods for enhancing neurorehabilitation |
2019246836 |
|
10/10/2019 |
|
Allowed |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility patent covering methods for placing a mouthpiece in a patient's mouth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Canadian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2969731 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Allowed |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering various aspects of the mouthpiece such as shape, center of gravity, and the locators |
3131684 |
|
2/26/2022 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering computer systems and methods for enhancing neurorehabilitation |
189954 |
|
8/28/2019 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Design patent covering non-invasive neurostimulation device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chinese Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Chinese Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
202080031721.1 |
|
2/26/2020 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering computer systems and methods for enhancing neurorehabilitation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
European Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
19183730.1 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering overall system design, including controller and mouthpiece |
19190373.1 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility patent application covering methods of placing a mouthpiece in a patient's mouth prior to engaging in NINM |
20712806.7 |
|
2/26/2020 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering computer systems and methods for enhancing neurorehabilitation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Israel Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
285901 |
|
2/26/2020 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
Utility application covering computer systems and methods for enhancing neurorehabilitation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russian Application No. |
|
Application Filing Date |
|
Status |
|
Russian Patent No. |
|
Issue Date |
|
Subject Matter |
2019112637 |
|
4/25/2019 |
|
Pending |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|